Rare 14k gold checkerboard in pristine condition!!!
Member for
11 years 11 monthsAmbassador and a very nice one at that.
Member for
11 years 11 monthsMember for
13 years 7 monthsSo what's the difference between the Ambassador and the Everett? Both ads are dated 1952.
Then to complicate things, we have this 1949 ad showing the 21 jewel Ambassador as a completly different beast.
In rereading various period-close Ambassador examples in the database, I think the 3 Everett ads didn't show up until 1952.
Member for
12 yearsIn reply to So what's the difference by William Smith
These 1953 ads show yet another name.
[quote=William Smith]
So what's the difference between the Ambassador and the Everett? Both ads are dated 1952.
Then to complicate things, we have this 1949 ad showing the 21 jewel Ambassador as a completly different beast.
In rereading various period-close Ambassador examples in the database, I think the 3 Everett ads didn't show up until 1952.
[/quote]
Member for
13 years 7 months
Member for
14 yearsMember for
12 yearsIn reply to Thanks Will that's the advert by mybulova_admin
[quote=mybulova_admin]
Thanks Will that's the advert I was looking for. I knew I'd seen it before in this configuration.
Park Lane for me too.
Piper, what's the date code on the back if the watch?
[/quote]
Not the Park Lane, wrong case.
This is either a redial or a marriage. Nice looking though.
Member for
14 yearsIn reply to mybulova_admin wrote: Thanks by bobbee
Member for
13 years 7 monthsYea I confused Admin with that ad. I was showing the dial configuration , as the case is different in ad from subject watch. still thinking through the other choices. Ambassador, Everette, and isn't there a similar 21 jewel named Gentry? . . . or some model name close to "Gantry"?