Hello everyone! Adding another Bulova to the database. I think this is an ad match to Margo. This seems to be non-conforming as the case is stamped 49 and the movement has a T mark. There seems to be something scratched above the mark and I can't quite make out what it is… Looking to see what you all think! Thanks!
![03/21/2022](/sites/default/files/watches/01D88E5B-6766-438A-9F0E-FA0617FB7D8D.jpeg)
![03/21/2022](/sites/default/files/watches/B6F56E5B-5645-4A42-ADF1-B601A39BF63F.jpeg)
![03/21/2022](/sites/default/files/watches/75319083-9FFB-4C06-9304-47858D98D1A1.jpeg)
![03/21/2022](/sites/default/files/watches/DEC60B08-D5B0-4428-9904-D84A2CAE070F.jpeg)
![03/21/2022](/sites/default/files/watches/28588B38-0ACF-4E29-A9C7-9CE201EEDBC7.jpeg)
![03/21/2022](/sites/default/files/watches/85033CB2-984E-4F98-A0AB-523D85F5419D.jpeg)
Yes I would agree with Margo, like this one https://mybulova.com/watches/1947-margo-12029. But you are on the right track that it has probably had a movement/dial replacement. Based on the unique case design I would still be ok with Margo as an ID, noting replacement.
1949 Bulova Margo
In reply to Yes I would agree with Margo… by Kathy L.
In reply to I agree with Kathy, the case… by mybulova_admin
In reply to agree, 1949 Bulova Margo by Geoff Baker
In reply to Agreed, 1949 Bulova Margo by neetstuf-4-u