I know Bulova wasn’t the only company to put some variation of Hudson Maxim’s name on a watch so I figured, what the hell, let’s see what the panel has to say. This watch belongs to a friend. He supplied the pictures.
The movement was made by Racine Freres. The only marks on the case appear to say GERBER SWISS.
Initially, I told him it doesn’t have the hallmarks of a Bulova. But I don’t know about the very early days and how Bulova did things. He found some reference in a form saying Bulova used Racine Freres movements in the earliest watches.
If this flat out isn’t an early Bulova in any way, please remove it from the database. It sure would be cool if it was though.
In reply to Bulova were not stamping… by mybulova_admin
In reply to Bulova were not stamping… by mybulova_admin
In reply to Bulova were not stamping… by mybulova_admin
In reply to When my friend first got… by Stinky_Sullivan
Strong evidence now suggests that the names Hudson and Maxim appearing on early wrist and pocket watch dials are not for the namesake Hudson Maxim the inventor but as a coming together of 2 watch companies Hudson, proven to be owned by Arde Bulova and Maxim a Swiss manufacturer (Josephs' gig?)
Time will tell Us.
In reply to Strong evidence now suggests… by FifthAvenueRes…
The Hudson W. Co and Maxim relationship is briefly discussed here: